Do you notice a big difference in games like "Fortnite" between Monitor 144hz and TV with 60 Hz + input lag? When I look at twitch I always feel faster, even though I do the same thing. That's why
There are worlds, just from the input lag
Then I'll probably get one
First, monitors usually have a sharper image than TVs and second, if your graphics card (!) That gives 144 generate images / sec a much "quieter" image than 60 frames / sec…
The question is: WHAT creates the graphics card depending on a set resolution, so for example at 1024x768 pixels… If that does not DO THAT, you can hang on the back of what you want - it will not anymore
So I'm sitting in front of a 144Hz monitor and in games like CS: GO is quite a noticeable difference noticeable (to my 60Hz before), if not huge. Whether that really limited the input lag, I do not really know, as there are already some factors depend on (the FPS delivers the PC, the reaction time of the monitor [in a TV monitor, in general, much worse]), also has Fortnite to my knowledge a tick rate of 30Hz, which should also be a negative factor.
Have 160fps so jap accomplishes that, since I play only esport title
Please consider:
For example. :
640x480 = 307,200 pixels
1024x768 = 786,432 pixels
etc… Usw… PRO FRAME at the same frame rate, say 60 FPS or Hz…
Now you increase the frame rate to 144 Hz…
Results in
640x480 = 737,280 points to be calculated per second
1024x767 = 1,887,437 pixels to be calculated per second
etc… Etc… That costs RMS PERFORMANCE at the expense of the "Game Flow"… Images / sec is NOT the measure of all things
