Is the PC 1300 HardwareRat worth it?
I'm considering if I should buy the PC from HardwareRat for 1300 euro
My goal was that I can keep my Fps over 144 in games like Fortnite, and can I use 2 monitors?
Pull the 1200s of hardware advice as an alternative in Breacht, if it should be something finished.
I personally think that is not profitable!
The 800 euro Hardwarerat PC is the one with the best price performance ratio. If you're looking to make a difference of 500 euro, what you really feel is the graphics card. A 1070ti is almost as strong and costs about 450 euro, a RX 580 no 200 euro. So I would not pay more for this PC like 1200 euro.
The 1200 euro Hardwarerat PC has the newer RTX 2070 and is therefore at least as good, so I would take the.
If constant 144 FPS in Fortnite is your requirement, then I would rather resort to an i5-9600K along with a corresponding motherboard. The Unreal engine generates a high load on a core, there's every bit of single-core performance advantage and there's an Intel even better.
Say, you have to build yourself. Then I would also replace the same GTX 1080 with the RTX 2070 and take a 500GB SSD, otherwise you could orientate yourself on his build. However, if you are only on Fortnite, would certainly synonymous ne GTX 1060 enough.
Okay thanks, if my colleague comes in the next and help me with my pc / would then build everything zsm myself what exactly should I change then? 500gb ssd and an i7-8700k vllt? And how does it work with the motherboards?
I've written a NEN i5-9600K, if you want to have a constant 144 FPS in Fortnite. If you also want a constant 144 FPS in Battlefield 5, then you need the i7-9700K, the old 8700K, I would not necessarily take more. Mainboard according to a Z390er, e.g. The ASRock Extreme4 or something.
Yes, and then, while you're at it, a 500GB SSD (or 480GB), would just take the cheapest, should probably be the Patriot Burst. And the graphics card is the RTX 2070, at Caseking the EVGA 2070 Black Edition is just cheap.
The 9th series is barely better than the 8 in single core performance.
Generally, the improvements are very small.
So you can buy the 8th thoroughly new.
But if a 9600K costs as much as a 8600K, but is soldered, then it's worth it. More.
The Lot of the 9600k is not the best either.
If you still want to behead him yourself is e.g. The 8600k then better.
After all, I did not say that you should generally buy the 8th gene, but only that it is still buyable.
I'll just make the stark claim that someone who actually wanted to buy a finished PC from hardware advice, certainly will not mind the CPU. And as I said, as long as they cost the same, I see no reason to take the 8600K. If the 8600K now 50 euro cheaper, I would recommend the synonymous.
