IMac or Macbook to cut (videos) and gamble (Fortnite)?

I have a question.

And why should I want to cut and gamble an iMac or a Macbook? I play games like Forinte, Call of Duty, Battlefield, GTA V and so on.

But I also want to cut videos. Of course, a Macbook Comfort-Technisch is better but I think on an iMac you can play better games.

Cut to video, both devices are through iMovie what is available for free:-)

To play both go (I had a long time a MacBook, unfortunately not at the moment) comes to a stop on how important you z.By a larger screen would be that you have the iMac and possibly (depending on the installed parts) synonymous better graphics, etc…

Many Thanks. Is because the new gene. Of the MacBook Air sufficient? What do you think?

A bit weak for cutting, too weak to play (only onboard graphics).

I guess so. My iMac is already a bit older and I have a MacBook as I said currently, unfortunately, but the latest Apple devices are indeed equipped with the latest technology. So I would not see a problem there. You just have to watch how you want to gamble your games. Do you have them on CD? Then make sure when buying that the MacBook has a drive, if not it can be purchased separately

Two answers two opinions and now?

Both are in terms of value for money, although more than terrible, but for

Call of Duty, Battlefield, GTA V etc.

are you with the 1,799 euro iMac here.

The MacBook you can completely forget in the price region. Does it have to be an Apple product for you? If you do not care about price, that fits naturally. Otherwise, you're more than just wrong with Apple.

UHD Graphics 617 is a bit weaker again - and that's just HD.

Next question please ;-)

https://store.hp.com/...p-pavilion

Would that be an alternative?

Maybe you can get an opinion in the store again. Especially with the models which are exhibited and which one can also test. Since you can make a good decision:-)

How many times have you taken your computer recently or been missing while traveling? Do you really need a computer on the way or would you also have a mobile phone?

I would almost always recommend the iMac, which has a much larger display that makes it more enjoyable to work, more power, and you can maintain an upright posture and not always look down.

I even had a MacBook 15 ", then I noticed that I rarely take it with me, so now I have an iMac 5k and it's so much better for the home.

You mean the questioner, right? ^^

But gives benchmarks on YouTube for all his games. Is the most independent opinion you can get.

Oh yes, sorry. I meant the questioner:-)

In terms of hardware definitely, the GTX 1060 packs everything without problems on Full HD. From the price performance ago a difference like day and night ;-)

Especially the iMac is not expensive. The screen alone is worth more than the whole iMac.

Can you synonymous with good videos cut and stream?

https://store.hp.com/...p-pavilion

what would you say? Is this a better alternative?

"The screen alone is worth more than the whole iMac."

Then Apple would make but decent losses. Or how exactly can one interpret the sentence?

Regardless of this: That may be that you will of course already get a nice device. Helps but nothing if I want to gamble and then for 1.299 euro get a completely useless device. From me then the 1.499 / 1.699 euro iMac - you can then get here rather, even if the price-performance point of view here is still completely absurd.

That is correct. A screen in the quality - which you first have to find - costs almost as much as an iMac alone. Mouse and keyboard are still there.

Nah, leave it.

Jup, the i7-8750H is even faster than an i5-8400. Is enough for everything thick!

Would anyone have a better tip? So that I can compare? So I tend to go to the HP Pavilion now. Could you write some more laptops in the price range 0-1300 Euro.

Why?

Again, the question: What brings you the screen when you have some games - sometimes even even on HD - on Full HD with the Radeon Pro 560 (1.699 euro) with low frames have extremely fight? And then stream it? Of course you can do that, but that makes sense… Not really.

So now again. Which PC / laptop would you recommend to me now? I do not really look like this anymore: /

If your budget knows no boundaries and you want something from Apple: An iMac with a Radeon Pro 580.

If you want something with a good price-performance ratio, you can take the above-mentioned HP - which is comparable to the Radeon Pro 580 of the GPU - or even look in here: https://geizhals.de/..._23~9595_6

The important components are already limited. And that's definitely enough for everything. MSI is quite like to buy in the region, because I would sometimes read through Concrete tests. Purely in terms of performance but very similar.

Just look at the specs:

2.3 kg
Height: 25.4 mm
1TB HDD storage
1920x1080 at 15.6 "

The thing has performance, but also enters into serious compromises.

Thanks a lot. I think I take the HP laptop mentioned above if it is good enough to play and cut videos!

https://geizhals.de/...at&hloc=de

Otherwise would recommend this here. Has a much larger SSD, which is not completely impractical. Is also the question of how much memory you need about.

Well, I think I would still tend to HP if you would not say now that he can't keep up with the MSI. Think but already, and I think that the price performance ratio is a bit better at the HP. And I do not want to play all the games on the highest graphics settings, but so on medium high (not Epic).

The linked MSI notebook is from the linked miser summary - they all have a GTX 1060 and therefore take almost nothing with the HP.

The memory is just maybe a sticking point. On the MSI you have a large 512 GB SSD and on the HP just a 128 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD.

So would you rather recommend the MSI?

Costs 100 euro more. Personally, it would be worth the extra charge but for the SSD and would possibly expand with an external HDD. But as I said just a question for you, how much memory you need.

Yes, thank you, I will sleep on it for a few more nights.