In your opinion, is this PC good for recording and streaming games like Fortnite, PUBG BO4, Battlefield V, etc?
Assembly service is not worth it, even if it should be your first home, invest a few hours rather than 10% of the purchase price.
Take this SSD here: https://www.mindfactory.de/...37653.html, it's more gusty, it's a smoother PCIe SSD and moreover it's MLC memory instead of the TLC NAND on the Crucial, so it's better in every area.
Personally, I would not use an X processor. The CPU has an open multi…
For 50 euro more you can also use an 'older' 1800x because you have 16 logical cores and the clocks also quite high. https://www.mindfactory.de/...44034.html
Otherwise, it is a good compilation.
EDIT: By the way, the Vega56 is just for ridiculously cheap 270 euro:
https://www.mindfactory.de/...23140.html
It is quite loud because of the radial fan but there's no argument against it at the price.
In principle it works, but a Ryzen 5 is a bit weak for streaming.
I would recommend the Ryzen 7 2700 on his X470 board, you can also overclock the cooler with it super.
The Ryzen 5 2600X is simply a waste of money because it is the same chip as the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Otherwise you get for 50 euro less a Vega 56 with 8 GB VRAM, which I would prefer here. But everything fits.
Edit: Here you get everything in the offer: https://www.mindfactory.de/...s/MindStar
Opinions are split there. The others recommend me the 2600x to stream and record for the money, the others claim he was much too weak. I'm at a loss. And the 2700/2700x costs a lot more money.
You can easily enter YouTube on YouTube Ryzen 5 2600 streaming. I can tell you that it will make you sweat in some games. That's why you invest a bit more and have your rest for the next few years. Have added a link above.
OK thank you.
But the 1800x does not cost much… And that is still a power house with 16 logical cores.
No problem. For 90% of the games, probably one Ryzen 5 2600 is enough to stream, but there are already games in which the Ryzen 5 1600 is system requirement. So there's hardly any room left to stream. So I prefer 2 cores and 4 threads more and each game stream without problems. If you build yourself, you still have saved yourself money. As written the 1800x is also a very good option. Alternatively just the 2700th
Since streaming requires a lot of CPU power, I recommend the Rzyen 2700 instead of the Ryzen 2600. This CPU then has 8 cores / 16 threads, which is optimal for streaming because there are 4 cores available for the game and 4 more Cores for the stream. So you can then stream in Full HD in high quality.
In addition, I recommend you a second SATA SSD with 500 - 1000 GB. So you can make sure that the SSD is fast enough to read data from the game and at the same time write the stream to the hard disk.
If you want to stream, you should install the games you want to stream on an SSD instead of HDD.
Your case should last be equipped with at least 3 fans, so that the heat of the CPU and GPU is well out of the case, e.g. One of the below blows in and two which blow the air out.
The Rzyen 2600/2600x is definitely weak for streaming, especially in games like Battlefield. Here necessarily a CPU with 8 full cores, like the Rzyen https://www.mindfactory.de/...33730.html (please without x)
How about the 1700x?
Goes too, the 1800x is definitely better in games.
Look Mal: If you take the Vega instead of the 2060, which is definitely the better choice, then you have the money for the 1800x, or has the budget suddenly shrunk? And if you still build yourself now you can install a better mainboard for a few € more, but only if you want to overclock.
The extra charge of the CPU with x is not worthwhile at Ryzen, then you can also take the same Rzyen 1700 (without x).
In any case, the 1700/2700 is much better (+ 30%) than the 1600/2600, with 2 cores / 4 threads more.
Since the CPU is the most important component in streaming, I would have recommended to you not to save on it, but rather to let the budget grow for another month.
So would you recommend the 1700 without x? Will not break my budget so blatantly, have looked at times on YouTube and the 1700x makes in comparison to 2700x not a lot of difference. Sure, 15 FPS more, but no significant or?
Yes between 1700 → 2700 are about 10% difference. In addition, you can overclock any Rzyen CPU, you have a good cooler.
So take 1700 instead of 2600 for my budget for streaming / recording for the above games?
In any case, the 1700 is much better for streaming than the 2600, yes!
OK thank you! One last question, which GPU would you attach to the 1700?
Your choice for the https://www.mindfactory.de/...92351.html is very good, that's exactly what I would take! The RTX 2060 creates in Full HD all games in ULTRA with about 70 FPS.
You can also take a https://www.mindfactory.de/...67546.html, which creates in Full HD in (very high) all games at 60 FPS, and that is just a bit louder than RTX.
The Vega 56 is, as written above, very fast, but also very loud and it gets hot too fast. I would advise against that… Unless you build a water cooling on the Vega graphics card…
OK thank you.
Which RTX card would be recommended? Should be quiet, inexpensive and fast.
I hope it works out well and then I wish you a lot of nonsense and success in streaming! ))
I have linked you to the MSI 2060 Ventus above, which meets all 3 criteria.
Ah OK thanks.
Can I have a B450 motherboard on the Ryzen 7 1700 CPU?
