How much watts does this whole PC system need and is it good to gamble and does it make sense how much fps would you get in fortnite full HD?

Ma
- in Hardware
18
al

The power supply is not visible. And your link does not work (of course).

But is a good compilation in my opinion.

Ma

Yes, how much watts should I take?

al

I would take at least 550. 500 would work too, I think.

Ma
Ma

OK

La

600 watts in my opinion!

Otherwise top. But a waku?

Kn

Joa, suits.

But why not a i5 9600K? Is cheaper and better!

Is water cooling used for design or just for overclocking? Because a good air cooling is actually absolutely sufficient.

As a power adapter, I would take 500W. For example, a Seasonic Focus Plus Gold 550W with a 7 year warranty or, if quiet, a Bequiet Straight Power.

Ma

I wanted to try overclocking to about 4 GHz

La

A Ryzen 2600 would do it too…

Ma

Will try to overclock to 4ghz

Kn

Try? With a good air cooler, there will surely be 5 GHz as well. As I said, an air cooler is enough and cheaper. For example, a Bequiet Dark Rock 4 should be more than sufficient, which transports up to 200W of waste heat.

La

I would say so too.

Kn

That's true, but in gaming, the i5 is definitely better. Price performance is of course much better for the Ryzen…

Ma

Especially in fhd is the better and in qhd just 10fps the CPU makes sense only if you swim in the money and in a year again want to buy a new CPU because the are just too few cores and Threads you have already seen like that 8600 is on the battlefield and the 9600 is now just the same as a 8600 just more expensive as it takes hold of Intel's old generation take rename and zack equals one hundred euro more for 2 percent more power? I see black for Intel if they continue to do so

Ma

I would not pick as you did because you can replace the CPU again in a year well you now have your 29-30fps more but how does that look in the future since the Ryzen is definitely the better choice if you are not wasting your money Just because of the name of Intel, the k and the current performance they will not always have because games are always developed again on more kernr and if that is the case, all cores run at 100 percent and so your GPU is under-challenged and you get too little power from the GPU because the CPU is the terrible BOTTLENECK and then you can buy again a new CPU PLUS motherboard… IS THAT THE VALUE?

Kn

I think you have not read correctly. Les again my text. There's the i5 9600k is cheaper! As the 8600k. And yes, the processors are not the most future-proof, but these at least 10fps more are already noticeable! I myself would not buy the CPU, yet it has an extremely good gaming performance.

Ma

If I have so and so over 100 fps then I have the 10fps anyway eh anyway if you have no monitor for the first time 144hz

Kn

Well, most have a 144Hz monitor with such a setup… If you overclock the CPU, there are also more than 10fps difference…