Would like to play games like MC, Fortnite but also Apex Legends?
How much reaction time should I need?
Because I want to get this monitor:
ACER ED323QURA
For games like Mc, Fortnite and Apex Legends you can easily get a 60hz monitor, generally I would recommend a response time of between 1-4ms (for these three games, I'd generally recommend 1-2ms).
Thus, your monitor will fit well, but would still be overkill if you really only play these three games
Yes, the response time of the monitor eg 1 ms eig does not say much, it depends on how good that panel is installed in the monitor is say input lagg. Since this is not specified by the manufacturer, it is difficult to find a good monitor.
The best you are looking for on Google or YouTube for monitors that have been tested, for example, "Hardware Dealz" has recommendations from about 150 euro to 2000 euro and over
Hardware Dealz does not test these things, he gets them sent or buys them exceptionally white himself and reviews that - he does not measure reaction times or anything like that. There are professional reviewer.
The worst answer in the area for a long time. That makes no sense at all.
Do not pay attention to the reaction time.
Buy desired resolution and refreshrate, order, self-test, return on demand.
The reaction times are irrelevant because not standardized, manufacturers can test what he wants and write down what he wants - the reaction times are practically always many times higher than indicated.
But it does (more or less), these three games do not need high-end equipment, with a 60hz monitor with 4ms reaction time one gets along very well. These are pretty simple games where a higher hz frequency and a few milliseconds make no difference.
Therefore it would be overkill 400 euro to pay for a monitor although you would get by with 150 euro.
Is of course another story if you have other games or movies and co. I want to play on whatever I wrote.
(Not directly wrote, but you can imagine it with my choice of words.)
This is total nonsense. The amount of games I play is not an argument against Monitor xy. According to your logic, I can also buy NEN 50 euro cpu and ne 60 euro gpu because the games are synonymous with running. Just not that good. Wow. What an insight.
All these games benefit from high refresher rates and even if I only play one game? So what - I play this 8 hours a day. That's why the part makes no sense.
Next: You recommend manufacturer information to nonstandard information, the response time information are completely out of thin air, so you can then logically white also not shopping.
If it '' only '' about these 3 games is the monitor is not overkill… It is absolutely not smart to close the amount of games played on the necessary refreshrate, because there's absolutely no connection.
You would like the logic z.b. A Counterstrike profi NEN recommend 60hz screen because he plays only one game and you get along with it. Do you even notice that this makes absolutely no sense…
(Meh CS and generally shooter plays better with + 144hz, except with one hand.)
I apologize for my "senseless and stupid" answer, it contains nothing but mistakes. Did you want to hear that?
My statements go out of test, which I have carried out myself, the result just gave exactly what I wrote.
It is true that one can't trust the reaction time data, but these values were "officially" taken, so I wrote them.
It is true that it is stupid to have a monitor, let alone any other hardware just for a handful of games, as sooner or later somebody else will be playing, so I wrote that it is overkill for exactly these three games. Sure, when I think about it that was an idiotic train of thought of me, and I see that too.
So again forgiveness, if my statements are flawed and / or not understandable, I'll tell you again, it was the results of my tests.
It seems to me that the old man is in a fever.
Uh not heard for a long time!
Yes classic gel?
Incidentally, you quoted me wrong above. Of 'stupid' I said nothing. But your info is really unhelpful and / or useful for these reasons. There's no help for any useful or useless unspecified self-tests - if you say A, B must come, where are the tests, where can I read them, what did you test and what did you determine? Etc. Pp.
The tests were mainly about how different monitors with different frequencies and reaction times behave on games of all kinds.
I do not (or no longer) have a proof or exactly written down results, the remaining information is just, which frequencies are sufficient for which games and which are optional, the reaction times had pretty much always no difference, whereby the span there also only 1 -4ms (official values) were.
Is anything but professional, but very helpful.
In the three games of the questioner 60hz would be sufficient, with the same applied skill it makes no difference whether 60hz, 144hz, or even 240hz.
At Fortnite and Apex, there were often times when it even better connects with the 60hz variant (which was also illogical on my part, but it was just that.), Mc I have nothing to say
Yes, as I said, hardware dealz has recommendations
That hardware dealz tests it myself, I've never mentioned
Well, actually. '' … Search… For monitors that have been tested for example '' Hardware Dealz '' '' - so yes. The recommendations refer to the price range and your statement implies the would have been tested and based on this gbs recommendations by price range.
