Have never played Fortnite before, but I play PUBG on my cell phone every day and am totally addicted to it. Many people I know think that the games are totally similar. I would be totally interested in what you think is better and why.
Both just crashed over time.
Apex is very cute
These games only clear the wallet.
In what way?
I liked Fortnite better because it is more designed for the casual gamer. Pubg is more hardcore, but it's also a lot of fun.
Are both Battle Royale Games so the basic principle is similar but otherwise the games are completely different.
Fortnite is rather covenant and "childish" with lots and quick builds. PUBG, however, is rather realistic or military.
I recommend neither of the two just because of "cell phone", but everyone has his.
Colorful*
Until there are no more notes.
How does it empty the players' wallets?
In which young people get PaySafeCards and buy V-Bucks.
And what does that have to do with the game?
That practically forces players to pay, in which seminal skins and other things can only be bought by buying V-Bucks. In vain there's nothing.
In vain there's nothing.
Yes, pretty much the whole game with no restrictions. With PUBG and Fortnite you don't have to pay anything. If you absolutely want to have a skin it is your problem. The game doesn't force you.
Although the game is free, new dance steps (emotes), but the costumes, gliders and pickaxes cost real money. The «epic» armor «Highland Warrior», for example, is currently available for 1500 V-Bucks, which is around 15 euro. So far, Epic has raised over a billion dollars. In theory, you could unlock these things without money, but that requires a lot of skill - and even more patience. Especially since most weapons or outfits are only available for a limited time.
Of course, this is a clever idea of the Fortnite inventors: nobody has to spend money to win. But everyone wants to spend money to look even cooler when they win.
Anyone who sprints through Fortnite in the pink teddy costume will have a chat on the break the next day. These digital status symbols are a continuation of the cult of branded clothing. "It used to be the new Nike sneaker, today it's the new Fortnite outfit," said Philipp Rüegg.
Anyone who sprints through Fortnite in the pink teddy costume will have a chat on the break the next day.
Your worldview is a mystery to me.
To write it with the same example; a teenager who does not wear Yeezys or Limited Edition Air Force 1s is not laughed at either. If someone has a cool shoe, you can possibly talk about the fact that he has exactly the shoe that you find so cool. But if someone else wears a normal 0815 shoe - then they just won't talk about it. Nobody itches. It is exactly the same with Fortnite and PUBG.
And you don't seem to be active in gaming? It's just about the game. It is not about that, if you want, you can also buy this or that. You can use the game 100% without restrictions. Yes, when I was playing Fortnite there were professional players who hadn't bought a single skin. And they were still in tournaments for several thousand or even tens of thousands of euro.
I never said that he was laughed at. You describe exactly what I tried to say: They talk about it, they get attention what many like. That's why players buy these things. Because that is how they start a conversation. You may not be laughed at but often ignored, what do you mean by that? The Fortnite Shop is not part of the game or how? You may win a few thousand euro. But look at how much Fortnite has collected. The few thousand euro will also seem ridiculous to you.
I'm not interested in the prize money. I want the players not to be disadvantaged. The shop is not an essential part of the game. And also the quote: "Before it had to be the new Nike sneaker, today it is the new Fortnite outfit", I feel more than nonsensical. Games in particular are about a player's skills. If you have not bought skins but are still good, you will get prestige.
This in-game rip-off is a mess, and that's why the https://www.test.de/Spiele-Apps-im-Test-Alles-andere-als-kindgerecht-5197290-0/ called the game "questionable" in autumn. We should talk about that. And because of this, building pressure on a manufacturer would be absolutely appropriate.
Why are you commenting on my answer at all? You see very well that it is about me.
I can clearly see that it's about you. The player just doesn't stop. And that's probably the people who are important for it.
And what the STaTtuNG WAREnTeST says must be absolutely correct?
I played Fortnite myself, otherwise I wouldn't comment. And I'm definitely not the only one who thinks that way. You also can't speak for all players. That is your opinion and it stays that way. The fact is and remains that Fortnite is performing an indirect rip-off. And no, the important ones are those who look at games from a different perspective. That is why there are age limits. GTA 5 e.g. The 10-13 year old players will never want to see that it is over 18. Your opinion: There's nothing wrong with that. The players are blind while playing, they lose control. This is precisely why there are teams of experts, among others. Stiftung Warentest examine the whole thing in more detail to see how the game works.
Have I ever said the opposite? Those who are good and play longer will spend money. Why do you find the quote more than nonsensical if you described exactly that in your previous comment?
When did I say that? Rather the opposite:
Yes, when I was playing Fortnite there were professional players who hadn't bought a single skin.
If someone has a cool shoe, you can possibly talk about the fact that he has exactly the shoe that you find so cool.
This is exactly what the quote describes.
