If I would get an rx 5700xt, my i7 4790k would bottlenecken this graphics card strongly, I would play competitive and need 144 fps as steadfastly as possible with zmB Fortnite. Is this possible with this GPU and CPU?
YES, the CPU brakes properly.
As a rough overview
https://pc-builds.com/calculator/Core_i7-4790K/Radeon_RX_5700_XT/0AH14jf2/8/
I could advise you to find videos on YouTube.
Just write i7 4790K + RX 5700xt, you might find Fortnine gameplay or your desired games.
I would not recommend this site.
He also says that a combination with Ryzen 5 3600 with Gtx 1660 super would give Bottleneck.
You can also look on the Internet, this site is rated poorly.
What do you currently have For a graphics card? Turn the graphics to the absolute minimum and set to 720p. If you have a reasonably usable card and then do not reach a constant 144 FPS, the processor limits and you will not be able to do it with the 5700 XT.
If your main concern is 144 FPS in Fortnite, I would also prefer the RTX 2060 Super. In the CPU limit, Radeons often cut a much worse figure than the corresponding cards from nVidia.
First, there's no choice of a GTX1660super.
Secondly, it is a fact that the GTX1660super brakes the RYZEN 3600.
Third, it's just a rough guide
Here is a GTX1660 with a Ryzen 3600
https://pc-builds.com/calculator/Ryzen_5_3600/GeForce_GTX_1660/0U913w8A/8/
I find it frightening that you, as a "community expert", recommend this ultra idiotic site. There are so many factors that this site can't know about.
Juice bag is absolutely right: If you set all details to low, you can find out how much FPS you can achieve with your CPU.
For games that still run properly with 4 cores, the i7 4790k is often still sufficient, especially if you have clocked it at 4.8 GHZ, your single core corresponds to a current CPU. 😊
I don't know what you're talking about.
Sure, the 1660 super doesn't exist there.
1. I can't see any problems on the internet, the Gtx 1660 super is most games with ultra 100% busy.
2. Where did you get the fact from? From this site or have you tested a Gtx 1660 super with a Ryzen 5 3600 yourself?
And linking to the badly rated site again and providing proof doesn't help either.
The processor will probably be too slow in Full HD. With WQHD and UHD it should fit.
Reading and understanding something are two different kinds of shoes.
So you think that a GTX 1660super occupy a Ryzen and the GTX1660super is not a bottleneck?! How do you explain your own statement that the GPU is 100% full? N / A? Does it click?
And you know them? Except for the factor… A 4790k and an RX5700XT.
Neither game nor resolution nor setting nor RAM are named, so only the generalization remains.
I also wonder where your answer to his question is?
First of all: Don't become rude, if you talk to someone like that, you can forget a discussion.
The graphics card should also limit, unless you have an FPS limit in games.
And I should have expressed myself exactly: The combination with GTX 1660 super and Ryzen 5 3600 have at least 100 - 140 FPS in most games, but also depends on graphics settings in games.
Unless you have 40 - 60 FPS in games with 100% graphics card utilization, then the graphics card is too weak for a certain game (although 60 FPS is also fine.)
With the station wagon, even a Ryzen 2600 would be sufficient.
N / A? Do you remember?
I asked a question like "CPU utilization: How much% is normal?", And even there you recommended a Ryzen 5 3600 for a GTX 1660 super.
If it slowed down the Ryzen, wouldn't you recommend it to me or at least say that another Graka is better for it?
First of all: Don't become rude, if you talk to someone like that, you can forget a discussion.
If you feel that way then I'm sorry.
I don't know what you're talking about.
I didn't feel that way about you either.
N / A? Do you remember?
No I don't remember I also can't imagine that I would fully recommend a Ryzen 3600 (unless there's a reason).
Send me the link so that I can understand this.
Finally a reasonable answer.
But what I don't understand is what you mean by getting a quote out of my previous answer and answering, but yes, everyone answers differently.
"No, I don't remember. I also can't imagine that I would recommend a Ryzen 3600 without reservation."
It's not bad, it happened 17 days ago, I also forget a lot.
Here is a quote from you after I said which CPU you would recommend:
"Well, that's actually actually simple.
AMD Ryzen continues from 1600AF
Ryzen 2600
Ryzen 3600
Ryzen 3700x
Ryzen 4xxx, which are coming first, but also fit on the AMD AM4 socket from chip B450. "
Here -
And do you have anything to say about my other statements?
So I was right for you, not an unreserved recommendation of the RYZEN 3600, but a list of the alternatives.
Quotes to differentiate better between what I answer and what my answer relates to. So just to get structure.
And do you have anything to say about my other statements?
What other statements? A GPU like a GTX1660super will always limit if you combine it with a Ryzen 3600, especially if you play in high resolution and in high settings… This is partly due to the 6GB VRAM (especially WHQL and above) and partly due to the low performance level.
But that is now also pointless to discuss.
This should be done elsewhere.
Well then I misunderstood you.
And to your statement: Yes, I also said that the graphics card is 100% full, depending on the settings in games.
But you can't think that with this card you can play all current games with ultra smooth, I do not want to clarify that here either.
Otherwise it is a good combination for games with 1080p.
Well, as you say, there's no point in having a discussion here. I still wish you a nice day.
