Is the PC good for Fortnite (144 FPS)?

I'm definitely not going to build a PC myself so first of all. I also live in AT.

https://www.cyberport.at/gaming/gaming-pcs/lenovo/pdp/1135-0tc/lenovo-legion-t5-gaming-pc-ryzen-5-3600-16gb-512gb-ssd-rtx2060-wlan-win10.html

Is the PC enough for 144 FPS in Fortnite and Valorant etc? Play in 1080p on low settings. And how do you like the PC in general?

Should work

OK

That should be good enough for the FPS number, you will certainly get more. You can easily get that out of the processor and graphics card in low settings.

But watch out. This can no longer be achieved at high settings.

If you don't want to assemble your own PC, let alone configure it yourself, you can have a look at an offer on the https://www.dubaro.de page.

You can also take that: https://hardwarerat.de/...windows-10 and let https://www.d-a-packs.at bring it over the limit, faster ram, twice as much ssd memory and much better cooling

As long as you have a current monitor.

They can only do 60 frames, even if advertising is made with more.

And yes, the pc can do it.

But every normal work computer is called "gaming".

Lenovo is ideal for work computers. Unknown to gaming.

Read the ad carefully. Which graphics are installed?

Right. Nothing above it. So an onboard graphic.

What is the most important thing for a game?

Oh right. The graphic.

Starts from 300 euro for a beginner's card.

https://www.pcgameshardware.de/Grafikkarten-Grafikkarte-97980/Specials/Grafikkarten-Test-Bestenliste-Radeon-und-Geforce-678322/2/

The graphic is deliberately concealed in the ad.

That is not trustworthy.

You can't read apparently.
It clearly states that an RTX 2060 is installed.

Plus, you're proving that you have no idea. Very few "work computers" have enough power for gaming.
And have you ever used a 144 Hz monitor?
Probably not.
It was the first time I sat on a 144 Hz monitor without knowing that it was a 144 Hz monitor. Nevertheless, I noticed a clear difference, so no placebo effect. I was only informed afterwards that it was a 144 Hz monitor.

There's not a word about them
Graphic.

This is a normal office PC.

Before you write, do some research.

The limit is 1000 euro.

You're kind of nonsense

You're stupid?

I provoked someone really well.

You're almost going through the roof. This is a success for me right now.

Provoking people is really fun.

Is not fun. One eye can perceive 50 Hz.

That's why the old televisions. 50 Hz. 25 fields per second.

But it's nice how upset you as a ignorant person are.

Studied something in electrical engineering. I 7 semesters. A notion of electrical engineering. Rather not.

I laugh at the ignorant who bloat here.

Just look at my ratings for fun.

Are you able to do this.

I'll describe it to you. If you can read it is actually einach.

Profile click. Then click on reviews.

If you can't do that, ask your teacher.

If your statement is correct that you can only perceive 50 Hz. Just give me one source for it.
Just because you studied electrical engineering doesn't mean you have a clue about everything about PCs. You also keep proving that you don't have that much idea.
Your information in this answer is just wrong.
Your "ratings" aka compliments are all several years old, so hardly meaningful.
In addition, they are only compliments, so no negative reviews, which further reduces the informative value.

So you can't google.

https://www.pcgameshardware.de/Monitor-Display-Hardware-154105/News/Wie-viele-Fps-kann-das-menschliche-Auge-sehen-1219025/

Good if you can type in German on google.

The article you linked contradicts you.
I can google myself, just haven't found anything that confirms you.

Here are excerpts from the article you linked:

"When it comes to movement, there's much more to it: under the right circumstances, short deviations could still be recognized at 500 fps - but then more as an artifact than a clearly recognizable image."
"Otherwise there are also differences among scientists. One of them says that 60 Hertz / Fps are certainly better than 30. 90 Hertz can still be perceived well, after that most people become less sensitive. That is why Oculus VR (Rift ) and HTC (Vive) decided for this value. Whether 120 or 180 Hertz can be perceived at the end is simply not known. At the latest, however, 200 Hertz / Fps felt like movements in real life. "

He does that quite often and the support doesn't mind.

Funny: You show him by his own argument (here: the linked article) that he is wrong and he no longer answers. ^^